Feminism at the final frontier

There’s been no shortage of opinion – and vitriol – surrounding Blue Origin’s recent suborbital spaceflight, which carried an all-female civilian crew: Kerianne Flynn, Katy Perry, Lauren Sánchez, Aisha Bowe, Gayle King, and Amanda Nguyễn.

Much of the media and social commentary has focused on the optics of the mission, questioning its framing as a feminist milestone or as a meaningful step forward for gender equity in space.

One article that particularly caught my attention – as I imagine it did for many others working in or adjacent to the space sector – appeared in the Guardian newspaper, provocatively titled ‘Blue Origin’s space flight is a giant leap – for Jeff Bezos’s ego, not feminism’.

As a journalist covering the international space scene for several decades, I am committed to a broad, international discourse on space and I believe this kind of cultural commentary deserves engagement, not dismissal.

One of the questions it raises – about symbolism, access and power – matters, especially at this juncture in the evolution of human spaceflight.

At its core, the Guardian article critiques the framing of the latest Blue Origin suborbital mission as a feminist milestone, particularly through the participation of Lauren Sánchez, journalist, private space executive and partner of Jeff Bezos. 

The writer challenges the idea that this spectacle – a high-profile flight on a privately-owned rocket – should be viewed as a triumph of gender progress. And she is right to point out the risk of conflating elite participation with systemic change.

But space, like society, is complicated. The symbols and milestones we project onto it carry weight, even when imperfect. Maybe we should ask: what does it mean to celebrate progress in space – and for whom is it progress?

Yes, there is a performative element to space tourism, especially when conducted by billionaires. But there’s also a very real and rapid shift in who has access to space – not just physically, but through influence, investment and imagination.

The presence of women on a mission like this is worth noting, even as we remain sharply aware of the broader inequities and exclusions in both space exploration and society.

It is no longer just about astronauts from elite military or science backgrounds. The emergence of private crewed spaceflight, for all its awkward growing pains and PR gloss, is undeniably reshaping public perceptions.

The fact that people are now debating whether or not a flight was feminist enough is in itself a sign that space has entered the cultural mainstream in ways we couldn’t have imagined a generation ago.

We can – and should – celebrate the long-overdue recognition of trailblazers like Wally Funk (on a previous Blue Origin flight), without pretending these moments represent full equality in spaceflight. We can acknowledge Lauren Sánchez’s visibility as a woman in the private space sector, without anointing her a feminist icon.

These stories sit on a spectrum, not of “success” or “failure” but of progress and evolution. Representation alone is not the end of the journey but it is a signpost on the road.

It is important to explore issues around gender, identity, power and access in space. True inclusion goes beyond seat assignments – it’s about who builds, who decides, who funds and who dreams.

It’s also about the stories we tell and who gets to tell them. If anything, the Blue Origin flight should remind us to keep pushing for deeper, more structural inclusion in space – for women, for underrepresented communities, for voices outside the billionaires’ club.

In this broader context, current US leadership under the Trump administration is playing a significant role – and may potentially end up with much to answer for. His return to power coincided with a critical juncture in space governance, where commercial ambition is surging ahead of public policy and global cooperation is giving way to renewed nationalism.

If space is to remain a shared domain – one that reflects collective human progress rather than elite ambition or geopolitical dominance – then leadership matters. Decisions made now about regulation, funding, international partnerships and orbital stewardship will shape who has access to space for decades to come – and under what terms.

As we look ahead to a decade that will likely include permanent lunar infrastructure, space-based manufacturing, and the rise of private space stations, we must keep asking hard questions.

Not just about who’s on board, but who’s left behind – and how we build a spacefaring future that reflects the full diversity of humanity.

Space is not neutral. It reflects the values of those who shape it. Let’s make sure those values are expansive, thoughtful and rooted in something bigger than marketing gloss or curated photo ops.

 #          #

Article: Blue Origin’s space flight is a giant leap – for JeffBezos’s ego, not feminism

Caption: NS-31 astronauts celebrate after a successful flight to space (from left): Kerianne Flynn, Katy Perry, Lauren Sánchez, Aisha Bowe, Gayle King and Amanda Nguyễn. (14 April 2025). 

Photo: Blue Origin

Flying to the edge

A FEW years ago while attending the annual Space Symposium in Colorado Springs as part of the ROOM Space Journal team I had the opportunity to sit inside a full-scale pre-flight module of Blue Origin’s space capsule.

It was on display outside the venue alongside a flown Blue Origin New Shepard booster, charred and scared from an earlier brief foray into low Earth orbit and so giving the whole display of touch of authenticity and realism.

Having clambered awkwardly through the access hatch and then across to my capsule seat I lay back and dared to think for a moment that this might be real. As my imagination fired the booster rockets I pushed back into my contoured couch before taking a quick look around.

There were five other passengers also likely lost in their own imaginary thoughts in what seemed a surprisingly simple but spacious space capsule. Big windows were aside each seat but the capsule was devoid of controls, buttons or levers that one might have imagined.

That’s because a Blue Origin flight differs from the Virgin Galactic mission in a few ways. Richard Branson uses a spaceplane with a pair of pilots onboard, whereas the Blue Origin capsule has no pilots (more space for paying passengers) and is be completely controlled by mission control on the ground.

Prior to today’s (Tuesday, 20 July) launch with passengers, Blue Origin has conducted 15 test flights - all spectacular in a very “Thunderbirds Are Go” kind of way but so far without any people on board, just a few experiments and plenty of data gathering instrumentation.

Just like the Virgin Galactic flight, the Blue Origin rocket will not launch its occupants into Earth orbit, but will give the crew a quick trip just above the line separating the atmosphere from space before returning back to the desert in western Texas. The Blue Origin mission will, however, fly at little higher to 62 miles high, compared to Virgin Galactic’s 55 miles.

Bezos’ landmark  10 minute flight is set to fly at 9:00 am EDT (14:00 BST), a date that that coincides with the 52nd anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing. He is being accompanied by his brother Mark and two other passengers - 82-year-old trailblazing aviator Wally Funk and 18-year-old Dutch physics student Oliver Daemen - who will each break longstanding astronaut age records on the flight.

Oliver’s father, Joes Daeman - the chief executive and founder of Somerset Capital Partners - was one of the bidders for a seat on the first crewed Blue Origin flight but lost out to an anonymous bidder who paid a reported $28 million at the widely publicised auction.

After a “scheduling conflict” prevented the unidentified winner from joining the first flight, Daeman, who had secured a seat on the second New Shepard flight, was bumped up to take pole position.
       
Be under no delusion this is very much a commercial venture. Daeman’s flight will mark the start of paid space-tourism flights for Blue Origin and there are plans to loft the second round of paying passengers this autumn.

"We intend to have two more flights this year, in 2021, for a total of three [crewed] flights, and many more to come in the future," said Ariane Cornell, Blue Origin's director of astronaut sales, during a press conference in advance of the first flight. "We have already built a robust pipeline of customers that are interested." 

 For both Branson and Bezos one question remains. Will these brief and expensive trips to the edge of space they offer be consigned to the category of joyrides and a series of ‘selfies’ for the family album, or will they prove more meaningful?

The question is legitimate because, since the days of Apollo when astronauts Bill Anders, Jim Lovell and Frank Borman became the first to witness a full Earth against the backdrop of space, astronauts are unanimous that viewing our planet from space is life-changing.

Earthrise, the iconic image snapped by Anders, is often credited as spawning the environmental movement and Space Shuttle and Space Station astronaut Nicole Stott agrees, ascribing the impact of viewing Earth from space as an astronaut’s “Earthrise moment”. .

In her forthcoming book Back to Earth (to be published on 11 November 2021) Stott inspires readers of all backgrounds and beliefs to come together to tackle our planet's most pressing problems - from water insecurity and pollution to the existential threat of climate change.

Seeing Earth from space for the first time, Stott was overcome by a realisation that moved her deeply. “This brilliant blue marble, shielded from the cold emptiness of space by only its razor-thin atmosphere, is a naturally existing system perfectly designed to support human life,” she writes.

The benefits of tourists flights to the edge of space may yet prove great indeed if those onboard experience their own “Earthrise moment”.

 Note: the launch can be viewed live via Blue Origin